Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning

Posted by Content Coordinator on Thursday, June 12th, 2014

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD

Executive Summary

Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Project C06, Integration of Conservation, Highway Planning, and Environmental Permitting Using an Outcome-Based Ecosystem Approach, is intended to support the integration of transportation and ecological planning. This project addresses the questions of how to (1) achieve interagency agreement on ecological solutions, (2) identify and leverage existing ways to increase predictability and assurance that credit will be allowed for addressing agency conservation and restoration priorities early in planning, (3) identify and leverage existing tools to increase resource agency confidence that mitigation commitments will be kept, and (4) make decisions last over time and across jurisdictions. This project is built on the groundwork laid in the development of Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service strategic habitat conservation approach, and other relevant ecosystem-based approaches (Brown 2006). The research approach and major findings of the project are summarized in this report.

This is the first report of a three-volume series. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2, summarizes the approach and outcomes of a partner project, Integration of Conservation, Highway Planning, and Environmental Permitting Through Development of an Outcome-Based Ecosystem-Scale Approach and Corresponding Credit System. The Practitioner’s Guide to the Integrated Ecological Framework is a guide to using one of the main products of these efforts, the Integrated Ecological Framework (IEF).

The research, conducted primarily between 2008 and 2010, suggests that although there is strong support for integrated transportation and ecological planning, there is room for progress in its implementation.

Surveys and interviews of staff in transportation and resource agencies indicate that the main incentives for integrating transportation and ecological planning are related to efficient decision making, fiscal benefits, and improved outcomes for the natural environment:

  • Efficient decision making: By investing time and money up front, transportation plans can better avoid critical resources; costly re-do loops and delays in project development can be eliminated or minimized; and advance mitigation on an ecosystem scale can be established.
  • Fiscal benefits: Monetary savings are expected to result from both efficiencies in the decision-making process and the ability to purchase land for mitigation early, thereby avoiding rising land costs and the declining availability of high-quality conservation areas.
  • Improved outcomes: Focusing on the ecosystem as a whole, rather than considering resources separately according to individual agencies’ jurisdictions, results in better identifying and prioritizing critical areas to conserve and protect. Making this information available and using it during transportation planning will result in better protection of critical natural resources.

Figure ES.1. Steps of the Integrated Ecological Framework.

Download full version (PDF): An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning

About the Transportation Research Board
www.trb.org
“The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal.”

 

Tags: , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr

CATEGORIES


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!

Views

What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.

Blog

The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.


Dear Friends,

 

It is encouraging to finally see clear signs of federal action to support a comprehensive US infrastructure investment plan.

 

Now more than ever, our advocacy is needed to keep stakeholders informed and connected, and to hold politicians to their promises to finally fix our nation’s ailing infrastructure.

 

We have already engaged nearly 280,000 users, and hoping to add many more as interest continues to grow.

 

We require your support in order to rise to this occasion, to make the most of this opportunity. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to InfrastructureUSA.org.

 

Steve Anderson

Managing Director

 

SteveAnderson@InfrastructureUSA.org

917-940-7125

InfrastructureUSA: Citizen Dialogue About Civil Infrastructure