InfrastructureUSA.org is a non-profit, online community whose mission is to bring together infrastructure experts, industry leaders, government officials and most especially interested citizens, to participate in vigorous conversation and generate action to address the U.S. infrastructure crisis.

REASON FOUNDATION

By David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. and M. Gregory Fields, Ph.D. Project Director: Baruch Feigenbaum

Executive Summary

Reason Foundation’s 22nd Annual Highway Report tracks the performance of the 50 state-owned highway systems. States are ranked in 11 categories including Interstate and rural primary road pavement conditions, deficient bridges, traffic congestion, fatality rates, unsafe narrow rural arterial lanes, capital costs per mile, administrative costs per mile, maintenance costs per mile and total highway expenditures per mile.

The study is based on spending and performance data that state highway agencies provided to the federal government for 2013, with the exception of traffic congestion data. The Federal Highway Administration is no longer publishing the traffic congestion data used in previous editions of the Annual Highway Report. As a result, this edition utilizes 2014 traffic congestion data from the Texas A&M Transportation Institute.

Although individual highway sections (roads, bridges, pavements) steadily deteriorate over time due to age, use, traffic and weather, they are also periodically improved by maintenance and reconstruction. As a result, system performance can improve even as individual roads and bridges deteriorate. Table ES1 summarizes recent system trends for key indicators at the national level. While bridge conditions and fatality rates continued to improve, the overall condition of the U.S. state-owned highway system worsened slightly from 2012 to 2013.

From 2012 to 2013, total revenues for state-administered highways increased almost 5%. However, nationally, expenditures for capital and bridges, maintenance and administration all dropped, possibly as states reduced outlays while waiting for federal action on a long-term transportation bill. The passage of the five-year federal transportation Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act passed and signed in 2015, may have added long-term certainty and additional funding to transportation. However, there is no guarantee that states will spend the additional money wisely in the coming years.

Having said that, the report shows that many individual states continued to make steady progress, and that declines in performance seem to be concentrated in just a few states.

South Carolina is atop the Annual Highway Report’s overall cost-effectiveness ratings for the first time since 1995. South Carolina has been a consistent top performer, ranking in the top 10 since 2003.

South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska and Maine round out the top five in the overall rankings.

While smaller, more-rural states make up the top five, several large urban states (Ohio—9th, Missouri—12th, North Carolina—15th, and Texas—19th) are ranked in the top 20 overall.

At the bottom of the overall rankings are Alaska, New Jersey, Hawaii, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

While most states deliver a high-quality road network cost effectively, several states have major state highway system performance problems:

• Half (50%) of the nation’s rural Interstate mileage in poor condition can be found in just five states: Alaska, California, Colorado, Washington and Indiana.
• Almost half (48%) of the country’s urban Interstate mileage rated in poor condition is in five states: California, New York, Texas, Michigan and Louisiana.
• Over half (54%) of the rural primary mileage in poor condition is in five states: Alaska, Iowa, Minnesota, Texas and Wisconsin.
• Traffic congestion in eight states (New Jersey, New York, California, Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Illinois and Washington) causes over 50 hours of delay annually per auto commuter.
• Although bridge conditions are steadily improving, six states (Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Hawaii) report more than one-third of their bridges as deficient.
• Fatality rates continue to improve, but four states (South Carolina, Mississippi, West Virginia and Montana) have fatality rates greater than 1.5 per 100 million vehicle-miles.
• Four states (West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania and Vermont) report that more than one-third of their rural principal arterial roads have narrow lanes that may be unsafe for today’s vehicles.

A widening performance gap seems to be emerging between most states that are making progress and a few states that are finding it difficult to improve. There is also increasing evidence that higher-level road systems (Interstates, other freeways and principal arterials) are in better shape than lower-level road systems, particularly local roads.

Download full version (PDF): 22nd Annual Highway Report

About Reason Foundation
reason.org
Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders

Tags: Baruch Feigenbaum, David T. Hartgen, M. Gregory Fields, Reason Foundation

This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 27th, 2016 at 12:59 pm and is filed under Aging Infrastructure, Competitiveness, Highway, Infra Views, National, Roads . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.